Minutes for Meeting of June 6th
2008
The Haven, Gabriola, B.C.
Attending:
Board by telephone: Connie Munro (Chair), Laurie
Kelley
Board in person: Paul Robillard, Rick
Jackson.
Ex-Officio Directors: Gerry Owen
Friends of Haven: none
Management: John Shields (also voting ex-officio
Board), Rachel Davey, Lorena Lavers, Louise Amuir,
Guests & Others: Scott Poole (Guest – by
telephone).
Regrets Linda Nicholls, Bill Chalmers, Bryan
Croeni, Ron Adkins.
Secretary/Treasurer and Recorder: Christine Purfield
1.
Call to
Order at 9:15a.m. by the Chair.
The Vision and Mission statements were
read by the Chair. Participants were asked to remember our dear Haven friend,
Steve Davis, as they listened.
2.
Check-In.
All present checked-in.
3.
Agenda.
Add: “Incoming Haven Board” as 4
(c) (John Shields)
Add “Development and Fundraising
Comments” under Committee Reports at 5(c). (Laurie Kelley)
Agenda approved with additions.
4.
Board
Affairs.
a.
Approval
of Minutes
Moved
and seconded:
That
the February 29th 2008 minutes be adopted.
Motion
carried unanimously.
b.
Old
business and action items:
Both
action items completed.
c.
Incoming
Haven Board:
John Shields updated the
Board on the names of the incoming Board of Directors. Their first Board
meeting will be June 14th, 2008 after the Members’ AGM.
d.
Executive
Director and Management Report:
John presented and elaborated on his
report.
·
He gave
thanks and appreciation to the outgoing Board for their past contributions. A
plaque will be commissioned to recognize all past directors and advisory
committee members, in addition to a card entitling all past directors to free
use of the Haven facilities. A tentative dinner date of September 27th,
2008 for both the incoming and outgoing Boards is being arranged.
·
Organizational
chart: Rachel’s title will be changed from Director of Programs to Director of
Haven Institute. Discussion ensued around the need to keep our options open for
reconfiguring the organizational chart. One Director cautioned that we not inadvertently
revert to the old General Manager model, which, he felt did not work.
·
There was
appreciation of the connecting of the business plan and the renewal strategy
facilities report. Louise updated the Board on her search for a local person to
assist with a facilities plan.
(10.30 am: Scott Poole joined
the meeting by teleconference)
We need to plan to renew the
facilities and the method of financing the plan, rather than planning to
budget.
·
Staff
Training: There was a consensus from management that there were good concepts
to the Dynamic Governance Training, but that any plan needs to be customized to
the Haven. Laurie Kelley reminded us to consider internal resources for future
staff training.
·
Recommendations
on page 8 of the report were deferred until discussion of the Renewal and
Development Document under 4 (g).
·
Questions
were invited for the Managers’ Reports:
i.
Clarification
was requested for the Haven relationship with Hua wei. It is on a contract by
contract basis facilitating training courses around the world and supporting
the courses offered by the Founders. (Wong & McKeen). A caution was
suggested that Haven be really clear in their relationship with Hua wei in the
light of current global business issues.
ii.
Clarification
was requested regarding a new Board member having a fiduciary responsibility
while representing a constituency. The Chair will bring the issue forward to
the new Board.
Moved and seconded:
That the Executive Director and
Management Report be accepted for information.
Carried
unanimously.
e) Haven
Business Plan and Recommendations:
Distributed
for information.
f) Haven
Three Year Renewal:
Distributed
for information.
g) Haven
Renewal and Development:
John
summarized the report and directed attention to the recommendations to the Board
on Page 3. Board discussion ensued.
Moved
and seconded:
That
the Board recommend to the incoming new Directors the following increase to
the Foundation 2008 capital budget:
Soundproofing
– consult sound technician on most effective method of muting sounds in
the Phoenix and Swallow buildings; build a partition between the auditorium
and P3; Sound baffling between ceiling and walls of P1 and P2.
Estimate:
$45,000 Contingency: $20,000
Carried
unanimously.
Moved
and seconded:
That
the Board approve in principal the “Three Year Facilities and Infrastructure Renewal
Strategy and refer its implementation to the incoming Board.
Carried
unanimously.
(Break: 11.25a.m. Reconvened:
11.31 a.m.)
5.
Committee
Reports.
a.
Audit
and Finance – Paul Robillard
Paul gave a verbal
report and referred to the quarterly financial statements embedded in the
Executive Director and Management Report. Paul outlined the increases to budget
over the previous year and also over budget. Favourable trends. A discussion
ensued regarding bursaries with a suggestion that the financial management of
funding allocations for bursaries be improved.
Moved and seconded
That the verbal Audit
and Finance report be approved.
Carried unanimously.
b.
Education
and Standards – Connie Munro
Connie gave a verbal report on a committee
meeting that occurred on May 9th. The meeting discussed core
curriculum development. This committee will be a “think tank” to develop ideas
and one or two faculty members will be tasked with what a core programme might
look like. There was optimism that something would be ready for inclusion in
the 2009 calendar. A caveat from a director not to neglect our current core
programmes.
Moved and seconded:
That the verbal Education and
Standards Committee report be approved.
Carried unanimously.
c.
Development
and Fundraising Comments – Laurie Kelley
Laurie stressed that this is not a
committee report but her comments on the areas of development and fundraising.
(Laurie subsequently emailed the points presented. The mail is attached as an
appendix to the minutes.)
6.
Other
Business.
None.
Meeting terminated: 12.01 p.m.
Next meeting: June 14th, 2008
(new Board)
Action Points:
·
Chair to
forward the issue of a new Board member’s fiduciary responsibility to Haven
while representing a constituency.
Attachments: Appendix A – Development
and Fundraising Comments: Laurie Kelley.
APPENDIX A:
DEVELOPMENT AND FUNDRAISING COMMENTS FROM
LAURIE KELLEY
The value of personal appeals and
relationship is apparent. Our
previous attempts at fundraising bear out that the traditional method AA
of direct mail doesn't work for us.
In Spring 2005, the direct mail campaign accounted for only 7% of our
donations while Personal appeals brought in the remainder at 93%. The
direct mail campaign cost us $4,000 more than it made and only resulted
in a 1.28% response rate. The personal appeals cost was $2,000 and
brought in $69,000.
In 2006 Spring, the Direct Mail cost was $10,000 and brought in $4,000.
In 2006 Fall, the Direct Mail cost was $10,000 and brought in $980.
Our future fundraising process will revolve around relationship
management with donors and alumni.